- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Low prevalence of CWH43 variants among Finnish and Norwegian idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: a cohort-based observational study
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS volume 22, Article number: 17 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Heterozygous CWH43 loss-of-function (LOF) variants have been identified as iNPH risk factors, with 10–15% of iNPH patients carrying these variants in cohorts from the US. Mouse model harboring CWH43 LOF variants display a hydrocephalic phenotype with ventricular cilia alterations. Our aim was to study the effect of CWH43 variants on disease risk and clinical phenotype in Finnish and Norwegian iNPH cohorts.
Methods
We analyzed CWH43 LOF frameshift deletions (4:49032652 CA/C, Leu533Ter and 4:49061875 CA/C, Lys696AsnfsTer23) in Finnish iNPH patients from the Kuopio NPH registry (n = 630) and FinnGen (iNPH n = 1 131, controls n = 495 400), and Norwegian iNPH patients from EADB (n = 306). The Kuopio and Norwegian cohorts included possible and probable iNPH patients based on the American-European iNPH guidelines. FinnGen cohort included iNPH patients based on ICD-10 G91.2 with the exclusion of secondary etiologies, and controls having no diagnosis of hydrocephalus.
Results
In the Kuopio cohort of Finnish iNPH patients, 2.9% carried CWH43 variants (Leu533Ter 2.1%, Lys696AsnfsTer23 0.8%), with one homozygous Leu533Ter carrier. In FinnGen, 3.1% of iNPH patients carried heterozygous variants (Leu533Ter 2.6%, Lys696AsnfsTer23 0.5%) compared to 2.5% of controls (p = 0.219, OR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.85–1.72), with no effect on disease risk or onset age. Importantly in the FinnGen cohort, none of the 23 compound heterozygote or 59 homozygote individuals had hydrocephalus diagnosis. In the Norwegian iNPH cohort, 5.2% of patients were heterozygous variant carriers (Leu533Ter 3.3%, Lys696AsnfsTer23 2.0%). No differences in clinical phenotype (age, triad symptoms, shunt response, vascular comorbidities) were found between carriers and noncarriers in any cohort. However, 74% of variant-carrying iNPH patients in FinnGen were female, compared to 47% of noncarriers (p = 0.002). Pedigrees indicated no autosomal dominant co-inheritance of iNPH and the CWH43 variants.
Conclusions
We studied the iNPH-associated CWH43 LOF variants for the first time on a population-scale. Contrary to previously reported findings in smaller cohorts, our study revealed a low prevalence of these variants in the population-scale Finnish iNPH cohort, with no effect on disease risk of iNPH. The prevalence in the Norwegian iNPH cohort was also low compared to previous studies.
Background
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a chronic neurological disease affecting the elderly population. Clinical symptoms are characterized by a symptom triad of deteriorating gait, memory problems and urinary incontinence [1, 2]. Neuroradiological findings include enlarged brain ventricles, tight high convexity sulci and often disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus (DESH) [3, 4]. It has also been found that asymptomatic ventricular enlargement (AVE) or asymptomatic ventriculomegaly with features of iNPH on MRI (AVIM) seems to precede the development of clinical symptoms in iNPH [5, 6]. The current treatment option to alleviate symptoms is shunt surgery for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage [7].
The pathogenesis of iNPH is not yet fully understood, but current findings support the idea that it is multifactorial, likely involving genetic predisposition and an increased burden of cardiovascular comorbidities [8,9,10]. Pedigrees of familial iNPH have indicated an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern for the disease [11], and familial history of iNPH has been reported in around 5–11% of cases in the Finnish population [12]. Importantly, new genetic findings are starting to emerge, particularly with our recently published large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) in normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) [8] and the previous findings of CWH43 variants being associated with iNPH [13, 14].
Two studies from the US previously showed that two heterozygous loss-of-function (LOF) frameshift deletions in CWH43 [4:49032652 CA/C, Leu533Ter and 4:49061875 CA/C, Lys696AsnfsTer23 (in GRCh38)] were overrepresented in cohorts of 53 and 94 genotyped iNPH patients. The prevalence of either one of these variants among these iNPH patients was 10–15%, which was significantly higher than in the controls [13, 14].
In a mouse model harboring heterozygous or homozygous CWH43 variants (CWH43WT/M533, CWH43M533/M533), which correspond to the human Leu533Ter variant, or a compound heterozygous model (CWH43M533/A530), the mice developed features of iNPH, including communicating hydrocephalus, as well as gait and balance problems. The deletions resulted in reduced ventricular cilia and altered distribution of GPI-anchored proteins on the choroid plexus and ependymal cells in the mouse brain ventricles [13]. Additionally, the homozygous deletion (CWH43M533/M533) in the mouse model caused downregulation of L1CAM in the ventricular and subventricular zones [15]. A recent CSF-proteomics study also reported L1CAM downregulation in iNPH [16]. Importantly, LOF variants of L1CAM are known to cause X-linked congenital hydrocephalus and neurodevelopmental defects [17], suggesting a potential link between congenital and late-onset chronic hydrocephalus.
So far, CWH43 variants in iNPH have not been studied in cohorts outside of the US or on a population-wide scale. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CWH43 LOF variants Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 on the risk and clinical phenotype of iNPH in a population-scale Finnish iNPH cohort and in a large Norwegian iNPH cohort.
Methods
We studied the effects of two frameshift LOF deletions in the CWH43 gene in relation to iNPH: chr 4:49032652 (CA/C, GRCh38, p.Leu533Ter) and chr 4:49061875 (CA/C, GRCh38, p.Lys696Asnfs23Ter) [NC_000004.12:g.49032653del, NM_025087.3:c.1596del, NP_079363.2:p.Leu533Ter (CA2916994, rs147750792) and NC_000004.12:g.49061878del, NM_025087.3:c.2088del, NP_079363.2:p.Lys696AsnfsTer23 (CA2917167, rs538616012)] [13]. In this study, we utilized two cohorts of Finnish iNPH patients from the Kuopio NPH registry (Kuopio cohort, n = 630) and FinnGen (FinnGen cohort, n = 1 131), and a cohort of Norwegian iNPH patients (Norwegian cohort, n = 306) from European Alzheimer's Disease DNA BioBank (EADB).
Participant selection
Kuopio cohort of Finnish iNPH patients
The Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) NPH registry was used to study the prevalence of CWH43 variants in the Finnish iNPH cohort and to compare the clinical phenotype between the variant carriers and noncarriers. The registry also has data on family relationships, and this was used to observe the manifestation of CWH43 deletions in iNPH pedigrees.
The KUH NPH registry contains data on the nationwide iNPH population, as it collects patient data from all neurosurgical units in Finland. The data includes information e.g. about demographics, symptoms, treatment, comorbidities, imaging, genotypes and family history. All the patients have been clinically evaluated by a neurosurgeon and a neurologist to fulfill the clinical diagnostic criteria for possible or probable iNPH based the American-European iNPH guidelines [1]. The patients had at least one triad symptom, which included gait problems, cognitive impairment and urinary incontinence, and neuroradiological findings indicative of iNPH, which include an Evans Index > 0.3, tight high convexity and occasionally DESH. Most of the patients also underwent a prognostic test prior to shunt placement, which included a tap test, a 24-h intraventricular pressure monitoring or a lumbar infusion test. A positive shunt response in the Kuopio cohort was determined based on a clinical evaluation at 3 months. This included various measures, ranging from a liberal overall clinical assessment to objective modified 12-point Kubo scale-based grading, where a reduction of at least 1 point indicated clinically significant improvement, as well as measured gait velocity [18].
The recruitment of relatives of potentially familial iNPH patients has been done using questionnaires and phone interviews. This was part of previously published studies, where the methods were explained thoroughly [12, 19].
The Kuopio cohort of Finnish iNPH patients consisted of 630 unrelated possible or probable iNPH patients who were genotyped for the two CWH43 variants. Additionally, five iNPH family pedigrees were observed, from which 14 asymptomatic relatives were genotyped.
FinnGen cohort of Finnish iNPH patients and controls
To study the prevalence and disease risk of CWH43 variants in relation to iNPH on a population-wide scale, a Finnish cohort of iNPH patients (n = 1 131) and healthy controls (n = 495 400) genotyped in the FinnGen study data release 12 was used. FinnGen is a public–private research project that combines genome and digital healthcare data from over 500 000 Finns nationwide [20].
To identify the iNPH patients in FinnGen, we used the same method as in our recent NPH GWAS study [8]. Cases were selected using the International Classification of Diseases release 10 (ICD-10) diagnosis code G91.2. Cases with a potential secondary etiology for the disease, i.e. sNPH, were excluded based on diagnoses appearing prior to the first diagnosis of G91.2 (Fig. 1). This previously developed case-selection algorithm [8] was developed to align with the American-European iNPH guidelines, selecting only patients with possible or probable iNPH for the analysis, excluding those with potential sNPH [1]. All the iNPH patients had passed the genotyping quality control (QC). The age of the cases was defined as the age at the first G91.2 diagnosis, and cases were excluded if they were under 41 years old.
The controls were the remaining FinnGen participants, excluding individuals with any hydrocephalus diagnosis, as defined by inclusion as a case in the FinnGen G6_HYDROCEPH endpoint. These individuals had available diagnostic and demographic data and had passed genotyping QC. The age of the controls was defined as the age at the end of follow-up, death or moving abroad.
Many of the patients from the Kuopio iNPH cohort are known to also be included in the FinnGen data, and due to this overlap, these two Finnish cohorts cannot be considered completely independent from each other.
Norwegian cohort of iNPH patients
The Norwegian iNPH patients were a subset of the larger EADB study cohort [21, 22]. The 306 Norwegian patients were evaluated according to the same standards as the Kuopio cohort of Finnish iNPH patients, fulfilling the criteria for possible or probable iNPH based on the American-European iNPH guidelines. The Norwegian iNPH patients were additionally evaluated using the Oslo iNPH Grading Scale prior to shunt surgery [23]. A positive shunt response for the Norwegian cohort was defined as an increase of at least 2 points on the Oslo iNPH Grading Scale, based on a clinical evaluation conducted at 6–12 months [23].
Genotyping
PCR genotyping in Kuopio cohort
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genotyping was used to genotype the CWH43 p.Leu533Ter and p.Lys696AsnfsTer23 variants in the Kuopio cohort. Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood samples using QIAamp DNA blood mini extraction kit (#51104, QIAGEN, Venlo, The Netherlands). TaqMan Allelic Discrimination Assay (#4351379, assay ID C_170677460_20, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), with Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System) was performed to identify the p.Leu533Ter. For p.Lys696AsnfsTer23, Custom TaqMan® assays (ID ANRWYER) was used.
Since, according to our knowledge, the homozygous variant of CWH43 has not been detected previously, Sanger DNA sequencing was performed on one iNPH patient confirming the presence of the homozygous CWH43 deletion of Leu533Ter (Fig. 2). Sanger sequencing was done using a BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (#4337457, Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System), primers CWH43_EX12-M13-R(TCCTGGTTGGATGGGTTGTC) and CWH43_EX12-M13-F (GCATTTGCTTAGTCCCAGTGC) amplifying a 593 bp area according to the kits protocol and analysis using 3500XL Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc). These genetic analyses were performed in the Genome Centre of Eastern Finland, Kuopio.
FinnGen genotyping
In FinnGen, genotyping was done by using Illumina and Affymetrix chip arrays (Illumina Inc., San Diego, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, USA) [20]. Samples were excluded if they were duplicates, or had ambiguous sex, high genotype missingness (> 5%), excess heterozygosity (± 4 SD), or non-Finnish ancestry. After the sample exclusions, the FinnGen dataset (release 12) included 520 210 individuals. Variants were excluded if they had high missingness (> 2%), low Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p < 1e-6) or low minor allele count (< 3). The samples were pre-phased with Eagle 2.4.1 using 20 000 conditioning haplotypes. Genotype imputation was conducted using Beagle 4.1 and a population-specific SISu v4.2 reference panel, which uses GRCh38 coordinates and includes 8 554 Finnish whole-genome sequenced individuals. The imputed genotypes were phased with Eagle 2.4.1. After imputation, variants with an imputation INFO score < 0.6 or minor allele frequency < 0.0001 were excluded. For Leu533Ter imputation Info value was 0.997 and for Lys696AsnfsTer23 0.987.
EADB genotyping
The EADB genotyping methods have been previously described [21]. A standard quality control was conducted on variants and samples from each dataset. Genotypes were then imputed using the TOPMed reference panel. As the genotypes of the Leu533Ter (imputation quality 0.992) and Lys696AsnfsTer23 (imputation quality 0.790) variants were imputed in the EADB data, we validated the imputation by comparing the PCR genotypes of the Finnish iNPH patients to their imputed genotypes in the EADB data. In this comparison the genotypes matched for all 486 Finnish iNPH samples, indicating perfect accuracy between the two methods.
Statistical methods
In the Kuopio and Norwegian cohorts, statistical analysis were done using IBM SPSS Statistics 27 software for the comparison between the CWH43 variant carriers and noncarriers, using p < 0.05 as the statistical significance level. Fisher’s exact test (two-tailed) or χ2-test (two-tailed) was applied for categorical variables. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used for continuous variables (non-normal data distribution).
For FinnGen data, all analysis was conducted in R 4.4.0. To test the effect of the variants on iNPH risk, three Cox Proportional-Hazards Models were generated: (1) Leu533Ter, (2) Lys696AsnfsTer23variants and (3) Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 heterozygous variants combined to one category, and homozygotes and compound heterozygotes to another. The relationships between noncarriers (CA/CA), heterozygotes (CA/C) and homozygotes (C/C) with patient’s onset age were assessed using the coxph function of the survival R -package [24, 25]. Cox Proportional-Hazards assumption for the models was tested with Schoenfeld test by cox.zph function of the survival R-package. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were plotted by using the survfit2 function of the ggsurvfit R-package [26].
Results
CWH43 variants in the Kuopio cohort of Finnish iNPH patients
Prevalence of CWH43 variants and clinical phenotype of iNPH
Overall, 18 (2.9%) out of the 630 Finnish iNPH patients from the Kuopio cohort carried either of the studied CWH43 LOF variants. For the Leu533Ter variant, 12 (1.9%) patients carried the heterozygous deletion, and in addition, one patient homozygous for Leu533Ter was found. Lys696AsnfsTer23 was carried as heterozygous by 5 (0.8%) patients. For Lys696AsnfsTer23 we did not find any homozygous carriers. The carriers and noncarriers of Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 had similar mean ages at symptom onset (67.6 years vs. 69.8 years, p = 0.165) and at shunt placement (70.6 years vs. 71.8 years, p = 0.348). For the variant carriers, 77.8% were female compared to 52.4% of the noncarriers (p = 0.052) (Table 1).
The CWH43 variant carrier status had no statistically significant effect when carriers of Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 were combined and assessed for the presence of the triad symptoms, type 2 diabetes (T2D), arterial hypertension (HTA) and shunt response. The full triad was present in 82.4% of carriers versus 71.4% of noncarriers (p = 0.418). All of the 18 patients who were CWH43 deletion carriers were shunted and had a high positive shunt response rate of 94.4%, based on clinical evaluation at 3 months, compared to 89.1% of noncarriers (p = 0.708). DESH features were observed in 66.7% of the CWH43 deletion carriers for whom brain MRI or CT scans were available (Table 1).
Case of homozygote CWH43 variant carrier
In the Kuopio cohort, we identified one homozygous CWH43 Leu533Ter carrier with iNPH. No homozygous carriers for this deletion have been previously reported with iNPH. The female patient had a symptom onset age of 60 with progressive gait difficulties. At the age of 75, her gait had deteriorated to a stride length of around 20 cm, accompanied by symptoms of freezing gait, balance problems, and the need for a mobility aid. Additionally, she had developed cognitive decline, with a Mini-Mental State Examination of 18/30 points, and paranoid symptoms. Urinary incontinence was also present. The first brain CT scans were taken only after symptom onset, with findings indicative of iNPH (ventriculomegaly, DESH and tight high convexity sulci based on the axial plane) (Fig. 3). A Spinal MRI offered no explanation for the gait problems and there was no known secondary etiology for the hydrocephalus. A CSF tap test (35 ml) was performed as a prognostic test pre-shunt, with no apparent improvement in symptoms, and intra-cranial pressure monitoring showed increased pulsatility, with the baseline in the normal range. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt (Spitz-Holter valve) was then placed, resulting in a moderate improvement of urinary and cognitive symptoms, but with no improvement in gait. A cortical biopsy taken during the shunt placement showed no diagnostic pathological findings. She lived to the age of 92.
CWH43 variants in iNPH families
Five pedigrees were drawn based on the genotyped patients and healthy relatives, indicating the CWH43 deletion carrier status when available. The pedigrees show no apparent indication of an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of iNPH that would be solely related to the LOF deletions in CWH43 (Fig. 4). Overall, in the Kuopio cohort of Finnish iNPH patients, two (11%) out of the 18 CWH43 variant carriers (both Leu533Ter carriers) were known to have a family member with iNPH.
Pedigrees of five Finnish iNPH families indicating the CWH43 variant carrier status when available. Black symbol indicates an individual with iNPH. G (= gait), M (= memory), U (= urinary) indicate an individual with triad symptoms with no diagnosis of iNPH. Gray shading indicates the presence of one, two, or three triad symptoms. NC = noncarrier. None of the pedigrees show apparent signs of an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of iNPH that would be solely linked to the CWH43 variants, based on the family members with available genotypes. Many family members in the youngest generation of these pedigrees are still under 60 years old, making it uncertain whether they will develop iNPH later in life
In the iNPH families, two asymptomatic relatives who were CWH43 variant carriers were identified, with available brain imaging. A 52-year-old heterozygous carrier of the Leu533Ter variant showed no signs of ventricular enlargement on CT scans at this age, despite carrying the genetic variant. In contrast, a 68-year-old heterozygous carrier of the Lys696AsnfsTer23 variant presented with AVE (Evans Index > 0.3) on MRI (Fig. 5).
Brain imaging of asymptomatic relatives carrying heterozygous CWH43 variants. A CT images of a 52-year-old Leu533Ter carrier, showing no ventricular enlargement. B MRI images (T1-weighted) of a 68-year-old Lys696AsnfsTer23 carrier, revealing asymptomatic ventriculomegaly (Evans Index 0.34) with no DESH
CWH43 variants in the FinnGen cohort of Finnish iNPH patients and controls
Prevalence of CWH43 variants and the clinical phenotype of iNPH
The prevalence of CWH43 variants in the population-wide FinnGen cohort of 1 131 Finnish iNPH patients was in-line with our observations in the partly overlapping Finnish Kuopio cohort. There were 29 (2.6%) heterozygous carriers of Leu533Ter among the iNPH patients, whereas 6 (0.5%) were heterozygous for Lys696AsnfsTer23. Among the 495 400 controls, 10 143 (2.0%) were heterozygous and 52 (0.01%) homozygous for Leu533Ter (Table 2). For Lys696AsnfsTer23, 2 394 (0.5%) were heterozygous and 7 (0.001%) homozygous. Overall, in the FinnGen cohort, 35 (3.1%) out of the 1 131 iNPH patients were carriers of either Leu533Ter or Lys696AsnfsTer23, compared to 12 572 (2.5%) of the 495 400 controls (p = 0.219, OR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.849–1.717). The mean age of the iNPH patients was 72.6 years (SD 7.7), and 60.7 years (SD 18.0) for the controls, while 47.7% of the patients and 56.4% of the controls were female.
Interestingly, from the phased genotype data, we also identified 23 controls who were compound heterozygous carriers for Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23, i.e. carried biallelic LOF mutation in CWH43. The median age of the homozygous and compound heterozygous carriers (n = 82) was 63 years.
Among the iNPH patients in the FinnGen cohort, the clinical variables were similar between the CWH43 variant carriers and noncarriers regarding mean age of onset [72.0 (SD 7.0) vs. 72.6 (SD 7.7), p = 0.528] or prevalence of comorbid T2D and HTA. The majority of iNPH patients that were carriers were female 74.3% compared to 46.9% of noncarriers (p = 0.002) (Table 3). Additionally, the FinnGen controls were compared for CWH43 variants and the clinical variables (Suppl. 1).
Effect of CWH43 variants on the risk of iNPH
To test the effect of Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 variants on the risk of iNPH, three cox hazard models were generated for the FinnGen cohort. The Schoenfeld test for all three models yielded p-values greater than 0.05, indicating that the assumptions of the models were satisfied. However, the CWH43 variants did not affect the iNPH onset age, as the model p-values were not significant (Leu533Ter p = 0.401, Lys696AsnfsTer23 p = 1.000, and Leu533Ter and Lys969AsnfsTer23 combined p = 0.413) (Fig. 6, Suppl. 2). This indicates that the Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 deletions do not affect the risk of iNPH in the Finnish population.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the CWH43 variants in the FinnGen cohort. A CWH43 Leu533Ter, B CWH43 Lys696AsnfsTer23, C CWH43 Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 combined. The green shaded area indicates confidence intervals. iNPH = idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Kaplan–Meier survival curves indicate no significant effect of CWH43 variants on the onset age or disease risk of iNPH in FinnGen cohort
CWH43 variants in Norwegian iNPH patients
Finally, we studied the CWH43 variants in Norwegian iNPH cohort. Overall, 16 (5.2%) out of the 306 Norwegian iNPH patients were carriers for the studied CWH43 LOF variants. For Leu533Ter, 10 (3.3%) patients were heterozygous, and 6 (2.0%) were heterozygous for Lys696AsnfsTer23. No homozygotes were identified either for Leu533Ter or Lys696AsnfsTer23 in this cohort (Table 4).
When comparing CWH43 variant carriers (Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 combined) and noncarriers, 37.5% of the carriers were female, compared to 49.7% of the noncarriers (p = 0.444). The mean age of symptom onset for carriers was 70.1 years, compared to 65.2 years among noncarriers (p = 0.074). Prevalence of vascular comorbidities T2D and HTA or positive shunt response rate did not differ between variant carriers and noncarriers (Table 4).
Discussion
CWH43 variants in Finnish population and Norwegian iNPH cohort
As the Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 variants of the CWH43 gene have been identified as risk factors for iNPH in cohorts from the US, and in a mouse model [13, 14], we investigated the prevalence of these variants for the first time on a population-scale in a Finnish cohort consisting of over 1000 iNPH patients and nearly half a million controls, as well as in a Norwegian cohort of over 300 iNPH patients. We found that the prevalence of CWH43 Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 variants in the Finnish population and the Norwegian cohort were lower than the 10–15% in previously reported cohorts [13, 14]: approximately 3% of Finnish iNPH patients, 2.5% of Finnish controls, and 5.2% of Norwegian iNPH patients were variant carriers. We also identified the first reported case of a Finnish iNPH patient carrying a homozygous CWH43 Leu533Ter variant. On the other hand, 59 controls who were homozygous carriers of either variant and 23 controls carrying compound heterozygous Leu533Ter and Lys696AsnfsTer23 variants causing biallelic LOF, did not have a diagnosis of hydrocephalus.
Our results indicate that, in the Finnish population, CWH43 LOF variants do not affect the disease risk of iNPH, contradicting previous findings from smaller iNPH cohorts [13, 14]. Initially, Yang et al. found that in a cohort of 53 shunt-responsive iNPH patients, 15% carried heterozygous CWH43 variants (Leu533Ter 7.5% and Lys696AsnfsTer23 7.5%) [13]. In another US cohort of 84 genotyped iNPH patients who shared the same ethnicity (white, non-Hispanic), 12% carried these variants (Leu533Ter 9.5% and Lys696AsnfsTer23 2.4%) compared to 5.5% in 532 healthy controls, with variant carriers having OR of 2.60 for iNPH [14].
Our current results align with our recent FinnGen GWAS study on NPH and iNPH, which used the same criteria to identify patients and controls as in this study, and where no iNPH-associated variants were identified in the CWH43 locus [8]. In the Norwegian iNPH cohort, the prevalence of CWH43 variants was similarly low, as in the Finnish cohorts. Unfortunately, no Norwegian control cohort was available for comparison in this study.
CWH43 variants and the clinical phenotype of iNPH
The CWH43 variant carrier status did not impact the clinical phenotype of iNPH in either the Finnish or Norwegian cohorts, based on the variables studied. An exception was the higher proportion of female variant carriers in the FinnGen iNPH cohort, suggesting a potential for sex-linked differences, but even in this cohort the overall number of cases with variants was small. The findings are in-line with previous reports regarding triad symptoms, shunt improvement and age distribution [14]. Notably, in this study and the previous studies, the positive shunt response rate among CWH43 variant carriers has been excellent [13, 14]. The prevalence of T2D and HTA did not differ between CWH43 deletion carriers and non-carriers, which is an important finding considering the role of CWH43 variants and the potential for disease-modifying interactions with vascular diseases in iNPH. Overall, T2D and HTA are overrepresented comorbidities in iNPH [9, 10] and are known risk factors for white matter disease, which is also frequently observed in iNPH [27,28,29]. On average, the cardiovascular disease profile and obesity rates in Americans and Finns are similar, supporting the comparability of our findings to previous CWH43 iNPH studies [30, 31].
A previous study found that only 21% of iNPH CWH43 carriers had DESH on imaging, compared to 57% of non-carriers, and that carriers tended to have a larger head circumference, which was suggested as a possible congenital hydrocephalus etiology with late-onset clinical presentation [14]. However, in our study DESH was more frequent, observed in 6 out of the 9 (67%) CWH43 variant carriers with available brain scans, a frequency similar to that previously reported in a Finnish iNPH cohort [32]. However, due to the small imaging sample sizes in these studies, drawing definitive conclusions requires further research.
CWH43 genotypes and asymptomatic carriers
The novel iNPH case harboring a homozygous CWH43 variant followed a natural clinical course of iNPH, with initial symptoms of slowly worsening gait problems that eventually evolved into the full symptom triad. Symptom onset at age 60 is on the early side of the iNPH age spectrum, but the overall clinical presentation of iNPH was typical [1, 4]. The patient remained undiagnosed for 15 years, and the shunt response was only moderate, possibly hampered due to the long delay between symptom onset and treatment [33].
In the FinnGen cohort, a further 59 individuals were identified as homozygous for deletions in Leu533Ter or Lys696AsnfsTer23 but without a diagnosis of any hydrocephalus. Additionally, 23 controls were compound heterozygous, causing biallelic LOF of CWH43. The median age of the Finnish homozygous and compound heterozygous controls was 63 years, placing many within the typical onset age range for iNPH [1, 4]. In a mouse model of CWH43 variants, heterozygous, compound heterozygous and homozygous deletions all resulted in pathogenic findings [13]. Despite the expectation that homozygous or compound heterozygous carriers would be at higher risk for iNPH, our data did not support this, as none of the iNPH patients in our cohorts were compound heterozygous carriers, and only one homozygous iNPH patient was found in the Kuopio cohort. This finding further highlights the low impact of these variants on iNPH. There is also the possibility of a protective genetic or environmental factor that counteracts the pathogenic effects of CWH43 variants, or some of these asymptomatic carriers could have undiagnosed cases of iNPH.
It is also unknown whether deletions in CWH43 lead to radiological features of AVE or AVIM without clinical symptoms of iNPH or if such changes appear earlier in life. For instance, the brain scans of a 52-year-old asymptomatic Leu533Ter carrier showed no ventricular enlargement (Fig. 5), suggesting that CWH43 variants might not cause gross anatomical changes early in life, which would be consistent with findings in the CWH43 mouse model [13]. However, a 68-year-old Lys696AsnfsTer23 carrier presented with AVE (Fig. 5). It should be noted that these individuals were relatives of iNPH patients, which may predispose them to a higher risk of developing iNPH regardless of the CWH43 variants. Thus, the observed asymptomatic ventriculomegaly could be influenced by other factors besides the deletion in CWH43, particularly given our findings that on a population-scale these variants have no impact on the disease risk of iNPH.
Familial iNPH and CWH43 variants
It is unknown whether iNPH associated with CWH43 deletions follows a Mendelian inheritance pattern. In the Kuopio cohort of Finnish iNPH patients, 11% of CWH43 variant carriers reported a family member with iNPH, indicating no significantly higher familial clustering of this genetic variant in iNPH compared to previous reports of familial iNPH in this population [12]. However, a previous study reported that 38% of iNPH patients carrying the CWH43 deletion had a familial history of iNPH or symptomatology [13]. Even heterozygous deletions in CWH43 in mouse models have resulted in a hydrocephalic phenotype, suggesting that CWH43 deletions could potentially predispose to autosomal dominant inheritance [13].
The pedigrees of Finnish iNPH families did not show clear evidence of an autosomal dominant or other inheritance pattern linked solely to the LOF deletions in CWH43 (Fig. 4), but the number of genotyped relatives in these pedigrees was limited to draw definite conclusions. Also, it must be noted that many family members in the youngest generation of these pedigrees have not yet reached elderly age and may yet develop iNPH in the future.
Conclusions
We studied the iNPH-associated CWH43 risk variants for the first time on a population-scale and in cohorts outside of the US. In the Finnish population, the prevalence of CWH43 LOF variants in iNPH was low, and with no effect on the disease risk of iNPH. In the Norwegian iNPH cohort, the prevalence of CWH43 variants was also low compared to previous studies. CWH43 variant carrier status did not affect the clinical phenotype of iNPH based on the studied variables, apart from a higher proportion of female variant carriers in the FinnGen iNPH cohort. Additionally, we identified the first reported case of a homozygous CWH43 variant carrier with a natural disease course of iNPH, but also multiple homozygous and compound heterozygous carriers without a diagnosis of any hydrocephalus. The brain scans of asymptomatic relatives carrying CWH43 variants failed to consistently show ventricular enlargement. Pedigrees from Finnish iNPH families did not show a clear autosomal dominant inheritance pattern linked solely to CWH43 variants. However, more extensive genotyping and long-term follow-up within the families would be necessary to reach a definitive conclusion about heritability. Overall, our results contradict previously reported findings in smaller cohorts, showing that in a population-scale Finnish cohort these CWH43 variants do not affect the disease risk of iNPH.
Availability of data and materials
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. For FinnGen, based on National and European regulations (GDPR), access to sensitive individual-level health data requires approval by national authorities for specific research projects and researchers. Health data is provided by the National Health Register Authorities, such as the Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare and Statistics Finland, and is approved by the Finnish Data Authority, Findata, or relevant agencies. Due to these regulations, FinnGen cannot grant access to individual-level data to others. Researchers seeking access to health register data can apply through the Finnish Data Authority Findata (https://findata.fi/en/permits/), while individual-level genotype data can be requested from Finnish biobanks via the Fingenious portal (https://site.fingenious.fi/en/) hosted by the Finnish Biobank Cooperative FINBB (https://finbb.fi/en/). Finnish biobanks can provide access to research projects within the scope regulated by the Finnish Biobank Act.
Abbreviations
- AVE:
-
Asymptomatic ventricular enlargement
- AVIM:
-
Asymptomatic ventriculomegaly with features of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus on MRI
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- DESH:
-
Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus
- EADB:
-
European Alzheimer's Disease DNA BioBank
- GWAS:
-
Genome-wide association study
- HTA:
-
Arterial hypertension
- ICD-10:
-
International Classification of Diseases release 10
- iNPH:
-
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
- KUH:
-
Kuopio University Hospital
- LOF:
-
Loss-of-function
- NPH:
-
Normal pressure hydrocephalus
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- QC:
-
Quality control
- sNPH:
-
Secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus
- T2D:
-
Type 2 diabetes
References
Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM. Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:S4-16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1227/01.neu.0000168185.29659.c5.
Bluett B, Ash E, Farheen A, Fasano A, Krauss JK, Maranzano A, et al. clinical features of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: critical review of objective findings. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2023;10:9–16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/mdc3.13608.
Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K, Yamaji S, Hirono N, Imamura T. CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1277–84.
Nakajima M, Yamada S, Miyajima M, Ishii K, Kuriyama N, Kazui H, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (third edition): endorsed by the Japanese society of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir. 2021;61:63–97. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2176/nmc.st.2020-0292.
Iseki C, Kawanami T, Nagasawa H, Wada M, Koyama S, Kikuchi K, et al. Asymptomatic ventriculomegaly with features of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus on MRI (AVIM) in the elderly: a prospective study in a Japanese population. J Neurol Sci. 2009;277:54–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jns.2008.10.004.
Iseki C, Takahashi Y, Adachi M, Igari R, Sato H, Koyama S, et al. Prevalence and development of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 16-year longitudinal study in Japan. Acta Neurol Scand. 2022;146:680–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/ane.13710.
Pearce RKB, Gontsarova A, Richardson D, Methley AM, Watt HC, Tsang K, et al. Shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus - Pearce, RK B - 2024 | Cochrane Library n.d.
Räsänen J, Heikkinen S, Mäklin K, Lipponen A, Kuulasmaa T, Mehtonen J, et al. Risk variants associated with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology. 2024;103:e209694. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1212/WNL.0000000000209694.
Eide PK, Pripp AH. Increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients compared to a population-based cohort from the HUNT3 survey. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2014;11:19. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/2045-8118-11-19.
Israelsson H, Carlberg B, Wikkelsö C, Laurell K, Kahlon B, Leijon G, et al. Vascular risk factors in INPH. Neurology. 2017;88:577–85. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003583.
Greenberg ABW, Mehta NH, Mekbib KY, Kiziltug E, Smith HR, Hyman BT, et al. Cases of familial idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus implicate genetic factors in disease pathogenesis. Cereb Cortex. 2023;33:11400–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/cercor/bhad374.
Huovinen J, Kastinen S, Komulainen S, Oinas M, Avellan C, Frantzen J, et al. Familial idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci. 2016;368:11–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jns.2016.06.052.
Yang HW, Lee S, Yang D, Dai H, Zhang Y, Han L, et al. Deletions in CWH43 cause idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. EMBO Mol Med. 2021;13:e13249. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1525/emmm.202013249.
Tipton PW, Atik M, Soto-Beasley AI, Day GS, Grewal SS, Chaichana K, et al. CWH43 variants are associated with disease risk and clinical phenotypic measures in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Genet. 2023;9:e200086. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1212/NXG.0000000000200086.
Yang D, Yang H, Luiselli G, Ogagan C, Dai H, Chiu L, et al. Increased plasmin-mediated proteolysis of L1CAM in a mouse model of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118:e2010528118. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.2010528118.
Kamalian A, Shirzadeh Barough S, Ho SG, Albert M, Luciano MG, Yasar S, et al. Molecular signatures of normal pressure hydrocephalus: a large-scale proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2024;21:64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12987-024-00561-5.
Adle-Biassette H, Saugier-Veber P, Fallet-Bianco C, Delezoide A-L, Razavi F, Drouot N, et al. Neuropathological review of 138 cases genetically tested for X-linked hydrocephalus: evidence for closely related clinical entities of unknown molecular bases. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126:427–42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00401-013-1146-1.
Kubo Y, Kazui H, Yoshida T, Kito Y, Kimura N, Tokunaga H, et al. Validation of grading scale for evaluating symptoms of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25:37–45. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1159/000111149.
Räsänen J, Huovinen J, Korhonen VE, Junkkari A, Kastinen S, Komulainen S, et al. Diabetes is associated with familial idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a case–control comparison with family members. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2020;17:57. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12987-020-00217-0.
Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, Sipilä TP, Kristiansson K, Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature. 2023;613:508–18. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8.
Bellenguez C, Küçükali F, Jansen IE, Kleineidam L, Moreno-Grau S, Amin N, et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat Genet. 2022;54:412–36. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41588-022-01024-z.
Korhonen VE, Helisalmi S, Jokinen A, Jokinen I, Lehtola J-M, Oinas M, et al. Copy number loss in SFMBT1 is common among Finnish and Norwegian patients with iNPH. Neurol Genet. 2018;4:e291. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000291.
Eide PK, Sorteberg W. Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 6-year review of 214 patients. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:80–91. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1227/01.NEU.0000363408.69856.B8.
Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling survival data: extending the cox model. New York: Springer; 2000.
Therneau T. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. R package version 3.7–0 2024. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival. Accessed September 23, 2024.
Sjoberg D, Baillie M, Fruechtenicht C, Haesendonckx S, Treis T. ggsurvfit: Flexible Time-to-Event Figures. R package version 1.1.0 2024. https://www.danieldsjoberg.com/ggsurvfit/, https://github.com/pharmaverse/ggsurvfit. Accessed September 23, 2024.
Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, Orszagh M, Jüngling FD, Bohus M, et al. White matter lesions in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and in an age-matched control group: a comparative study. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:491–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/00006123-199703000-00011.
Nasrallah IM, Pajewski NM, Auchus AP, Chelune G, Cheung AK, et al. Association of intensive vs standard blood pressure control with cerebral white matter lesions. JAMA. 2019;322:524–34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1001/jama.2019.10551.
Murray AD, Staff RT, Shenkin SD, Deary IJ, Starr JM, Whalley LJ. Brain white matter hyperintensities: relative importance of vascular risk factors in nondemented elderly people. Radiology. 2005;237:251–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1148/radiol.2371041496.
Imes CC, Burke LE. The obesity epidemic: the United States as a cautionary tale for the rest of the world. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2014;1:82–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s40471-014-0012-6.
Lundqvist A, Koponen P, Härkänen T, Borodulin K, Sääksjärvi K, Koskinen S. Trends and forecast of obesity in Finland. Eur J Public Health. 2018;28(214):146. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/eurpub/cky214.146.
Kojoukhova M, Koivisto AM, Korhonen R, Remes AM, Vanninen R, Soininen H, et al. Feasibility of radiological markers in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157:1709–18. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00701-015-2503-8.
Andrén K, Wikkelsø C, Tisell M, Hellström P. Natural course of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:806–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1136/jnnp-2013-306117.
Acknowledgements
We want to acknowledge the participants and investigators of the FinnGen study. The FinnGen project is funded by two grants from Business Finland (HUS 4685/31/2016 and UH 4386/31/2016) and the following industry partners: AbbVie Inc., AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Biogen MA Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb (and Celgene Corporation & Celgene International II Sàrl), Genentech Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LCC, Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Development Ltd., Sanofi US Services Inc., Maze Therapeutics Inc., Janssen Biotech Inc, Novartis AG, and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Following biobanks are acknowledged for delivering biobank samples to FinnGen: Auria Biobank (www.auria.fi/biopankki), THL Biobank (www.thl.fi/biobank), Helsinki Biobank (www.helsinginbiopankki.fi), Biobank Borealis of Northern Finland (https://www.ppshp.fi/Tutkimus-ja-opetus/Biopankki/Pages/Biobank-Borealis-briefly-in-English.aspx), Finnish Clinical Biobank Tampere (www.tays.fi/en-US/Research_and_development/Finnish_Clinical_Biobank_Tampere), Biobank of Eastern Finland (www.ita-suomenbiopankki.fi/en), Central Finland Biobank (www.ksshp.fi/fi-FI/Potilaalle/Biopankki), Finnish Red Cross Blood Service Biobank (www.veripalvelu.fi/verenluovutus/biopankkitoiminta), Terveystalo Biobank (www.terveystalo.com/fi/Yritystietoa/Terveystalo-Biopankki/Biopankki/) and Arctic Biobank (https://www.oulu.fi/en/university/faculties-and-units/faculty-medicine/northern-finland-birth-cohorts-and-arctic-biobank). All Finnish Biobanks are members of BBMRI.fi infrastructure (https://www.bbmri-eric.eu/national-nodes/finland/). Finnish Biobank Cooperative -FINBB (https://finbb.fi/) is the coordinator of BBMRI-ERIC operations in Finland. The Finnish biobank data can be accessed through the Fingenious® services (https://site.fingenious.fi/en/) managed by FINBB. Part of the computational analyzes were performed on servers provided by UEF Bioinformatics Center, University of Eastern Finland, Finland, supported by the Biocenter Finland. For maintaining Kuopio NPH registry, we thank RN Marita Parviainen and RN Tiina Laaksonen. We acknowledge Nikita Keskinen for revision of English grammar.
Funding
The study was funded by the Academy of Finland (Grant Number 338182), KUH VTR Fund, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Finnish Medical Foundation, JPND-JPcofuND; EADB (Grant Number 301220), Finnish Cultural Foundation (North Savo Regional Fund), Maire Taponen Foundation, and the Strategic Neuroscience Funding of the University of Eastern Finland. The Finngen project is funded by Business Finland and by international pharmaceutical industry partners: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Scibb, Genentech (a member of the Roche Group), GSK, Janssen, Maze Therapeutics, MSD/Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
Joel Räsänen and Seppo Helisalmi, shared first authorship. J.Rä, Se.H, Sa.H, M.H, V.L and A.L study concept or design; J.Rä, Se.H, Sa.H, J.Ra, V.E.K, A.J, B.GB, C.B, M.O, C.A, J.F, A.K, J.Ri, A.R, M.K, M.F, K.L, J.S, M.P, A.M.K, V.J, A.M.P, A.M, H.S, J.E.J, JC.L, P.K.E, A.P, M.I.K, M.H, V.L and A.L major role in the acquisition of data; J.Rä, Se.H, Sa.H, J.Ra, H.M, M.H, V.L and A.L analysis or interpretation of data; J.Rä, Se.H, Sa.H, J.Ra, H.M, M.H, V.L and A.L drafting/revision of the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content. All authors offered comments and suggestions to the initial version of the manuscript and endorsed the submitted version. All authors, upon request, had full access to all the data reported in the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Kuopio University Hospital Research Ethics Board (5/2008, 276/2016, 1041/2019). For Norwegians, the study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK) of Health Region South-East, Norway (2015/1313), and the Institutional Review Board of Oslo University Hospital (2015/8128). All patients provided informed consent. Subjects in FinnGen provided informed consent for biobank research, based on the Finnish Biobank Act. Alternatively, separate research cohorts, collected prior to the enactment of the Finnish Biobank Act (in September 2013) and the start of FinnGen (in August 2017), were collected based on study-specific consents and transferred to the Finnish biobanks after approval by Fimea (Finnish Medicines Agency), the National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health. Recruitment protocols followed the biobank protocols approved by Fimea. The Coordinating Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS) statement number for the FinnGen study is Nr HUS/990/2017. The FinnGen study is approved by Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (permit numbers: THL/2031/6.02.00/2017, THL/1101/5.05.00/2017, THL/341/6.02.00/2018, THL/2222/6.02.00/2018, THL/283/6.02.00/2019, THL/1721/5.05.00/2019 and THL/1524/5.05.00/2020), Digital and population data service agency (permit numbers: VRK43431/2017–3, VRK/6909/2018–3, VRK/4415/2019–3), the Social Insurance Institution (permit numbers: KELA 58/522/2017, KELA 131/522/2018, KELA 70/522/2019, KELA 98/522/2019, KELA 134/522/2019, KELA 138/522/2019, KELA 2/522/2020, KELA 16/522/2020), Findata permit numbers THL/2364/14.02/2020, THL/4055/14.06.00/2020, THL/3433/14.06.00/2020, THL/4432/14.06/2020, THL/5189/14.06/2020, THL/5894/14.06.00/2020, THL/6619/14.06.00/2020, THL/209/14.06.00/2021, THL/688/14.06.00/2021, THL/1284/14.06.00/2021, THL/1965/14.06.00/2021, THL/5546/14.02.00/2020, THL/2658/14.06.00/2021, THL/4235/14.06.00/2021, Statistics Finland (permit numbers: TK-53–1041-17 and TK/143/07.03.00/2020 (earlier TK-53–90-20) TK/1735/07.03.00/2021, TK/3112/07.03.00/2021) and Finnish Registry for Kidney Diseases permission/extract from the meeting minutes on 4th July 2019. The Biobank Access Decisions for FinnGen samples and data utilized in FinnGen Data include: THL Biobank BB2017_55, BB2017_111, BB2018_19, BB_2018_34, BB_2018_67, BB2018_71, BB2019_7, BB2019_8, BB2019_26, BB2020_1, BB2021_65, Finnish Red Cross Blood Service Biobank 7.12.2017, Helsinki Biobank HUS/359/2017, HUS/248/2020, HUS/430/2021 §28, §29, HUS/150/2022 §12, §13, §14, §15, §16, §17, §18, §23, §58, §59, HUS/128/2023 §18, Auria Biobank AB17-5154 and amendment #1 (August 17 2020) and amendments BB_2021-0140, BB_2021-0156 (August 26 2021, Feb 2 2022), BB_2021-0169, BB_2021-0179, BB_2021-0161, AB20-5926 and amendment #1 (April 23 2020) and it´s modifications (Sep 22 2021), BB_2022-0262, BB_2022-0256, Biobank Borealis of Northern Finland_2017_1013, 2021_5010, 2021_5010 Amendment, 2021_5018, 2021_5018 Amendment, 2021_5015, 2021_5015 Amendment, 2021_5015 Amendment_2, 2021_5023, 2021_5023 Amendment, 2021_5023 Amendment_2, 2021_5017, 2021_5017 Amendment, 2022_6001, 2022_6001 Amendment, 2022_6006 Amendment, 2022_6006 Amendment, 2022_6006 Amendment_2, BB22-0067, 2022_0262, 2022_0262 Amendment, Biobank of Eastern Finland 1186/2018 and amendment 22§/2020, 53§/2021, 13§/2022, 14§/2022, 15§/2022, 27§/2022, 28§/2022, 29§/2022, 33§/2022, 35§/2022, 36§/2022, 37§/2022, 39§/2022, 7§/2023, 32§/2023, 33§/2023, 34§/2023, 35§/2023, 36§/2023, 37§/2023, 38§/2023, 39§/2023, 40§/2023, 41§/2023, Finnish Clinical Biobank Tampere MH0004 and amendments (21.02.2020 & 06.10.2020), BB2021-0140 8§/2021, 9§/2021, §9/2022, §10/2022, §12/2022, 13§/2022, §20/2022, §21/2022, §22/2022, §23/2022, 28§/2022, 29§/2022, 30§/2022, 31§/2022, 32§/2022, 38§/2022, 40§/2022, 42§/2022, 1§/2023, Central Finland Biobank 1–2017, BB_2021-0161, BB_2021-0169, BB_2021-0179, BB_2021-0170, BB_2022-0256, BB_2022-0262, BB22-0067, Decision allowing to continue data processing until 31st Aug 2024 for projects: BB_2021-0179, BB22-0067,BB_2022-0262, BB_2021-0170, BB_2021-0164, BB_2021-0161, and BB_2021-0169, and Terveystalo Biobank STB 2018001 and amendment 25th Aug 2020, Finnish Hematological Registry and Clinical Biobank decision 18th June 2021, Arctic biobank P0844: ARC_2021_1001.
Consent for publication
All individual data shown has a written informed consent for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Räsänen, J., Helisalmi, S., Heikkinen, S. et al. Low prevalence of CWH43 variants among Finnish and Norwegian idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: a cohort-based observational study. Fluids Barriers CNS 22, 17 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12987-025-00625-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12987-025-00625-0